The idea that stuck out
to me most in "Designs for Learning: Studying Science
Museum Exhibits That Do More Than Entertain" by Sue Allen was,
“every intermediate step in the visitors’ experience must be sufficiently
motivating that they make the choice of continuing to invest time and attention
there.” This statement seemed important to me because as a Spark I can either
help or hinder the intermediate steps in the visitors’ experiences, and I am constantly
learning better ways to help keep the visitors’ engaged in the exhibits and
their own learning experiences. There are times when I am interacting with a visitor
and I can help answer a question or pose a challenge that will further spark
their engagement with an exhibit and keep them engaged, but then there are
those times when I try to do that and the guest loses interest. I need to keep growing
in my awareness of what motivates guests and know when to approach them and
offer a challenge or allow them to keep engaging with the exhibit on their own.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Evaluation plan (formative) - Sam S.
My capstone would benefit from several evaluations, both in the formative stage, as well as summative evaluation to inform long-term projec...
-
Observations: Observations would probably be the easiest method to use at MOXI since we already do it all the time. T...
-
http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/MoPOP_Full%20Evaluation%20Report_Final.pdf I was interested in this study because I got ...
-
Ring Launch- revised Engagement Levels: 1. Watch 2. Press button 3. Read sign 4. Manipulate materials Observing: ...
No comments:
Post a Comment