How does
the Contextual Model of Learning apply to evaluation in Informal Learning
Environments?
The factors of the Contextual Model of Learning strongly
influence how a guest behaves in a museum space, so they should also determine
how a guest is evaluated. The way a guest learns and what they learn during
their time is largely dependent on what their background is as well as their
reasons for being there. In addition, how guests interact with other people in
the space, including people they came with, other guests, and staff will also
have an impact on how they learn. All of these factors are important to know
when evaluating each guest individually in informal learning environments.
What
aspects of the Contextual Model of Learning (or the large Museum Visitor
Experience Model) are most interesting and why?
In Chapter 7, “The Museum Visitor Experience Model,” I found
Falk’s discussion of identity-based motivations and trajectories interesting,
as it puts each person that walks into a museum space on a specific path. I
thought about how each of these trajectories might look at MOXI, and think they
are usually pretty easy to spot based on who is in the group of visitors and
how they behave. I picture the “Explorers” as almost all young kids that come
with their families or schools. Explorers can be adults as well, but if they
are visiting with their own children or chaperoning a field trip then they
probably fall more into the “Facilitator” category. “Experience seekers” may
include tourists, or guests who have heard or read that MOXI is a popular spot
to visit in Santa Barbara. “Professional/hobbysists,” and “Rechargers” are probably
less common in MOXI than the other groups, but could include professionals
studying museum spaces.
In both articles, Falk discussed the satisfaction of a
visitor being dependent on their expectations and whether those expectations
were met during their visit, which is another thing that stuck out to me. When
many people picture what a museum looks like, I think that for the most part
MOXI meets those expectations. This definitely depends on the prior experiences
to each individual and their reasons for visiting MOXI. However, in many ways I
think that expectations are not met for some visitors, for example
professionals/hobbyists may be thrown off by the lack of signage. They may be
expecting to learn explicit scientific facts and be surprised when they don’t
find those on a nice plaque beside each exhibit. While some guests may become frustrated
because of this, others won’t even notice the lack of signage and this all has
to do with their expectations of MOXI.
I have a follow-up question/comment to your observations about meeting visitor expectations in MOXI, and whether meeting expectations should be our primary goal, or if changing those expectations would be a better approach. Perhaps if guests have some sort of indication that we are exploration-based, or information that they won't find signage, then they'll be more receptive to investigate their own questions rather than search for signs, and perhaps be more open to learning in the process. I think this relates to your comment on Sophia's post, Juliana, about encouraging guests to leave their immediate comfort zone in their visit.
ReplyDelete-Sam S
Delete