Feb 5/2019
Discussion on signage at MOXI;
I think having more information about exhibits could be
beneficial especially for guests who only have the ability to visit the museum
once. It would allow for visitors who desire to know how things work get more
information and maximize their experience at MOXI. Having QR codes could be a
beneficial way to do this in order to minimize signage in the museum.
In addition, I feel that implementing questions and
challenges could also be beneficial in order for guests to maximize levels of
engagement at exhibits at certain exhibits.
Of the signage at MOXI, I observe guests most often reading
the signage at Reactable. Often time’s people are confused about how to use the
exhibit so they refer to the sign however, the problem that I always encounter
is that the volume is not turned up on the cubes. The information on how to do
that is not on the sign (move the white dot on the right side of the cube)
therefore people often leave more frustrated or confused because even after
reading the sign they still cannot figure out how it works.
Readings;
Providing labels could increase the length at which guests
interacted with exhibits but could also limit their creativity depending on how
the label was worded. I think this is interesting because typically, guests who
spend longer periods of time exploring an exhibit will move through different
levels of engagement however, a label could limit them to being focused in one
level, creating a goal orientated exhibit. Adding one simple label to an
open-ended exhibit could completely change the exhibit to a
planned-discovery. I also find it
interesting how the Exploratorium label that stated “Try This, What’s Going On?
and So What?” was said to imply that the museum is the authority, keeper of
knowledge while the visitor is the recipient of knowledge. I agree with this
statement in that I want the visitors to ask these questions themselves and
creatively find solutions to these questions, however how do we know that is
happening? Ask a spark, I often ask guests “What do you think is going on
here?” Is there a difference between a spark interacting and asking a guest and
a sign asking a guest “What do you think is going on?” Is this still implying
the museum is the authority or does the change is wordage “do you think” give
the authority back to the guest? I agree that having labels worded as an invitation
or challenge is important so visitors feel that they are finding solutions and
thinking creatively and there is no set goal or phenomena that they are trying
to understand.
Yes, agree--Reactable can be a doozie to figure out when not facilitated and pieces are chaotic (low volume, etc). Do you think additional signage there would help? Or do you think it's a product of the depth of the exhibit?
ReplyDeleteAlso, I think there's a good conversation to be had about open-ended exhibits, exploration, and authority. How do we inspire curiosity and depth without the expectation of right and wrong?